Webflow vs Framer in 2025: which no-code tool to choose for a successful site?
Are you hesitating between Webflow and Framer to create a powerful site without code? This article, written byWebflow Gemeos agency, compares the two tools according to their strengths: CMS, SEO, SEO, animations, design, e-commerce... and helps you choose the most suitable solution for your project.
In 2025, the world of no-code site builders was considerably enriched, but two solutions are dominating the conversations: Webflow and Framer. Both promise to transform an idea into a powerful site without going through the developer box. However, their approaches, strengths, and limitations differ markedly. This article helps you choose the tool best suited to your business goals, your team and your technical constraints.
1. Product positioning and philosophy
Critère
Webflow
Framer
Vision initiale
Mettre la puissance d’un CMS et d’un éditeur visuel entre les mains des designers et marketeurs
Prolonger la logique de prototypage Figma dans le web live, avec un accent fort sur l’animation et l’interaction
Maturité (année de lancement)
2013
2021
Cible historique
Start-ups, PME, agences, e-commerce
Designers, créatifs, landing pages à haute densité visuelle
Webflow starts from a robust CMS base designed for content production and scale, while Framer capitalizes on a “canvas” interface that is very similar to a design tool to quickly deliver sites with a wow effect.
Bon à savoir
« Webflow brings structure to creativity, Framer brings creativity to structure. » —
Ben Parker, formateur no-code, conférence NoCode Summit 2025.
2. Easy to handle
Webflow
Longer but gradual learning curve
Interface divided into Designer (construction) and Editor (content management)
Extensive Webflow University documentation
Framer
Immediate handling for any user used to Figma or Sketch
Minimalist property panel, drag-and-drop logic
Fewer concepts to master (no complex CMS collection at the start)
For a very simple project (event site, portfolio), Framer offers an unbeatable time-to-market. For an architecture containing dozens of articles, categories or dynamic pages, Webflow becomes more intuitive in the long run.
3. Design: flexibility vs speed
Dimension
Webflow
Framer
Système de classes
Oui, proche du CSS natif (flexbox, grid)
Optionnel, approche « style overrides »
Variables design
Depuis 2023 (couleurs, text styles, spacing)
Oui, intégrées dès 2024
Animations
Interactions complexes (scroll, Lottie, JS)
Animations fluides, timeline intuitive
Templates
+2 000 (gratuites et payantes)
~400, souvent très visuelles
In 2025, Framer maintains the advantage for micro-interactions and motion design. Webflow responds with very complete Interactions 2.0, but their configuration is still more technical.
Pas d’e-commerce natif, intégration tiers via Shopify Buy Button
Multilingue natif
Webflow Localization
À venir (roadmap fin 2025)
If your strategy is based on content or online sales, Webflow already provides all the building blocks. Framer is best suited for promotional pages that are connected to an external back office.
THEwebflow seo agency Gemeos audited 50 sites published between January and June 2025, divided equally between Webflow and Framer. Here are the average metrics (PageSpeed Insights mobile):
KPI
Webflow
Framer
Performance (LCP)
1,9 s
2,1 s
Accessibility
98
97
Best Practices
99
98
SEO score
94
89
Key differences:
Framer inserts some analytics scripts by default, increasing the initial weight.
Webflow automatically compresses assets and minifies CSS/JS without a plugin.
SEO attributes (title, meta, alt) are managed in both cases, but Webflow offers one field per CMS template, reducing the risk of being forgotten.
Annual Webflow Conf event (San Francisco + live Paris)
Framer
Official plugins are still limited, but Zapier and Make meet the needs
The Components API (React) opens the door to custom widgets
Very active Discord community around motion
The number of resources (clonable, tutorials, freelancers) remains significantly higher on the Webflow side, an advantage for easily internalizing or recruiting.
Framer uses Vercel Edge Network, SSL, and global CDN, but without a history of multiple backups.
Both tools handle back-end updates; no server operation is required.
For regulated companies (finance, health), Webflow Enterprise SOC 2 Type II certification can be a decisive asset.
9. Use case: which tool for which project?
Scénario
Recommandation
Landing page d’A/B testing dans 48 h
Framer
Blog multilingue SEO à forte volumétrie
Webflow
MVP SaaS avec espace client (member area)
Webflow + Logic or Memberstack
Portfolio interactif pour studio créatif
Framer
Boutique DTC avec storytelling riche
Webflow E-commerce
10. Gemeos verdict: performance above all
Webflow and Framer are excellent representatives of modern no-code. Choosing one or the other will depend on:
the desired depth of content,
business needs (sales, SEO, location),
the time available to learn or subcontract.
At Gemeos, we prefer Webflow for its CMS robustness, its scalability and the security expected by our scale-up customers and SMEs. However, we do not hesitate to recommend Framer for ultra-creative campaigns or marketing prototypes to be deployed in a few hours.
Before deciding, establish your functional roadmap, estimate your target traffic and test each platform on a micro-project. You will thus be able to measure the handling, the speed of publication and the quality of the code generated.
Growth Marketer, Webflow expert and a jack of all trades. I take care of commercial operations, ensure the smooth running of projects and take care of issues related to marketing (SEO, Tracking, Copywriting, etc.)